← All technology familiesThe proposed unit of contribution
The supplied architecture describes a TransactionDNASeed associated with service execution. To make that useful, the record must bind the request, producing node, source state and observed result. A seed label alone does not measure the value of the service.
Account for repeated and failed work
A contribution system needs rules for retries, failed tasks and jointly delivered outcomes. Counting the same request twice would distort the record. The accounting rule must explain what earns recognition and how a disputed contribution is corrected.
Separate the technical and economic contracts
Execution receipts, transferable balances and purchasing power are different mechanisms. The economic design needs explicit issuance, ownership, transfer and reconciliation rules. This page explains the architectural concept; it does not offer a token sale or promise a financial return.
A practical example
A node fulfils one request and stores its readback. A repeated request retrieves that same outcome. Contribution accounting should recognise the completed service according to its declared rule, without treating the retry as a second independent service.
This explanation identifies the workflow and its boundaries; it does not claim a live operation.
Sources and optional further reading
KEDDEH WEB4 implementation and recovery runbook — source for the host integration described in this library, not certification of every industry application.
Related topic: IL-LLM · Immutable ledger. This is optional background, not a required next step.